In my last post, I made the point that many employee
engagement (EE) initiatives are a hoax.
In this article, I will elaborate on that point and assert that most
investments in EE are a waste of time and money. This may be offensive for those of you who
are EE professionals. In fact, when I discussed
these points with a close colleague who does EE for a living, his response was
“Are you out of your mind!” So at the
risk of alienating or angering the EE community, let me make my point.
First, if you’ve been involved in EE efforts for some length of time, you will
relate to the following scenario:
A senior executive decides the
organization needs to improve its employee engagement. A small team is formed and they buy the
services of a reputable EE consulting company.
The effort is rolled out with great fanfare, employees are strongly
encouraged to have their voices heard, and there is a corresponding flurry of
effort to respond to the survey results.
However, after 3-6 months, the energy level is down and the topic is
rarely discussed in leadership meetings.
One executive expresses dissatisfaction with the consulting firm hired
to do the survey and assist in implementation.
At this point, the initiative goes on the trash heap with other “failed”
projects and is soon forgotten.
What went wrong?
Nearly every EE professional I’ve worked with has a similar
story to tell. You see, the effort was
initiated on the false premise that the company could do something to “make”
the employees more engaged. Therefore, after
the pixie dust settled and the consultant took their magic wand to their next
project, the effort died (in some cases quickly). The point of my previous article was that the
decision to be engaged or disengaged is a personal choice that can be
influenced by the company but never coerced.
When companies invest money to bring the latest consultant or guru in to
“fix” their engagement problem, they are building on a false foundation and
once the hard work begins and positive results haven’t started pouring in,
leadership can lose patience and confidence. As an EE
professional, you can relate to the frustration of working with an executive
team that demands fast results, wants visible progress, and then blames you or
the whole notion of EE for having been a waste of time and money.
Don’t get me wrong – the executive suite has a lot to do
with creating the environment for engagement.
But if you’re looking for employees to embrace their work and support
the company, engagement starts with first-line leaders and supervisors. Policies, culture, and resources can be
improved to enable the engagement process to unfold, but if first-line leaders
lack the training and support to be effective, employees on those teams will decide
not to engage. Any initiative
pushed from the top down is doomed to fail from the beginning if not accompanied by an equally strong or stronger focus on first-line leaders.
Consider a different approach. First review company policies, culture, and
environmental factors to ensure consistency with the values and objectives of
the organization. Address areas of misalignment where necessary and enable employees to perform at their best under all circumstances. For example, if your vision or policies state
that you value innovation, yet managers routinely discipline employees for
bringing forward new ideas, the disconnect will create disengagement. Enabling performance is what the
executive team can do best, not trying to force engagement to happen. Second, start working closely with first-line
leaders. Make sure they have the
training and support they need to be world-class leaders that employees admire
and want to work with. While this might not be considered
“engagement” in the purist sense, the net result is the same. Something as simple as
communication training and coaching can go a long way to improving the
effectiveness of a new leader. Companies
frequently invest in this type of support for their senior executives, but
often, habits and poor leadership styles are already ingrained at that point
and more difficult to change. Start
early and avoid the potential issues later. Also help your first-line supervisors connect the dots between
their teams and your bigger picture.
Give them tools and resources to have that dialog on a regular basis. You might consider some illustrations
or frameworks that allow these supervisors to speak to the company’s vision and
strategy in simple, practical terms easily translated to a range of work
activities. If supervisors begin feeling
connected with the company’s strategy, it will positively affect the teams they
lead.
So next time you’re tempted to spend a lot of money to roll
out a new EE initiative, take a moment and think carefully about your
objectives. Is your organization
prepared to capitalize on an employee engagement effort? Are your policies, procedures, and culture
aligned and consistent? Are you doing
everything you can to support your first-line leaders? If you can answer yes to all or most of these
questions, then the added investment of a survey and some outside assistance
may be a good investment. If not, I
would recommend you wait and work to address these issues first. Save your money until you’re better prepared. The types of things I’m recommending are
usually within the capabilities and resources of the company – you don’t need to
pay an “expert” to tell you what should be common sense.
Duane Grove is founder of Connect2Action, a strategy
execution specialist at the intersection of employee engagement and executive
leadership, igniting innovation as a lever to accelerate your growth. Follow Duane on Twitter @connect2action and
connect with him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google+. Learn more by visiting
www.connect2action.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment